Palpable Nodules After Autologous Fat Grafting in Breast Cancer Patients: Incidence and Impact on Follow-up.

INTRODUCTION: Autologous fat grafting (AFG) is a promising breast reconstruction technique, following surgery. However, fat necrosis after AFG can cause palpable nodules, inducing anxiety and prompting additional investigations. We aimed to determine the occurrence rate and to identify the risk factors of palpable nodules in breast cancer patients prompting complementary explorations. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the computerized files of consecutive breast cancer patients who underwent AFG after mastectomy or breast conservative treatment (BCT) at our center from January 2013 to December 2016. We collected data regarding palpable nodule incidences and suspicious breast imaging findings that led to additional explorations. RESULTS: Of the 252 patients reviewed, 222 (88%) underwent AFG for breast reconstruction, while 30 (12%) underwent AFG for correction of defects after BCT. The follow-up period ranged from 0 to 74 months (median: 27 months), and 201 patients had follow-ups beyond 1 year. Of the 252 patients, 66 (26.2%) underwent at least one control imaging and 24 (10%) underwent a biopsy, including 6 (2.4%) locoregional recurrence. Sixty patients (24%) were diagnosed with nodules during follow-ups. Among them, 52 (87%) patients had additional imaging, and 17 patients (28%) had a biopsy, including 82% benign histology. Patients with BCT had significantly more palpable nodules at 1 year than patients who underwent total mastectomy (odds ratio = 2.50, 95% confidence interval: 1.04. 6.03, p = 0.04). CONCLUSION: This study underlines the importance of preoperative patient information. This intervention and its follow-up should be reserved for experienced teams to limit unnecessary additional explorations. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IV: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Exclusive autologous fat grafting: Feasibility, satisfaction, and quality of life.

OBJECTIVE: The main objective of this study was to assess the feasibility of breast reconstruction by exclusive autologous fat grafting (AFG). The secondary objectives were to identify predictive factors for technique failure and to assess the satisfaction and quality of life of patients who have benefited from exclusive AFG breast reconstruction using satisfaction and WHOQOL-BREF surveys. METHOD: We carried out a monocentric retrospective study. We included 118 patients who achieved breast reconstruction that was initially planned as exclusive AFG reconstruction, between April 2015 and November 2020. RESULTS: The success rate was 72.88% (86 patients). The only risk factor for failure we objectified was irradiation (OR=2.90). A total of 85 percent of patients felt that the result met their expectations. However, 82.93% rated their quality of life as good or very good. CONCLUSION: The AFG technique is well described, easily reproducible, and serious complications are rare. It allows for a less invasive autologous reconstruction than free or pedicle flaps. This type of reconstruction should probably be reserved for motivated patients with a small breast size or agreeing to a contralateral breast reduction procedure.

ACOSOG Z-0011 criteria impact on axillary surgery for early breast cancer in clinical practice: Evaluation in a retrospective cohort of 1900 patients.

BACKGROUND: There is a trend towards de-escalation in early breast cancer axillary surgery. In the American College of Surgeons Oncology Group (ACOSOG) Z-0011 trial, observation was shown to be non-inferior in terms of overall survival to complementary axillary lymph node dissection (cALND) in patients with up to two sentinel lymph node (SLN) metastases. The study included patients with T1-T2 invasive breast cancer, clinically node negative, undergoing breast-conserving surgery with SLN biopsy, followed by systemic therapy and radiotherapy. The aim of our study was to evaluate the impact of applying these ACOSOG Z-0011 inclusion criteria in routine practice. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This retrospective observational study was conducted in a French comprehensive cancer center where patients treated for breast cancer with primary surgery were prospectively included between 2010 and 2016. Patients meeting ACOSOG Z-0011 inclusion criteria were analyzed. RESULTS: Among the 1900 included patients, 1497 (79 %) met the ACOSOG Z-0011 criteria before surgery. Of these, 390 (20 %) had one or two metastatic SLN and could have avoided cALND. Out of these patients, 319 (81 %) presented cT1 tumors. During the study period, cALND was performed in 320 (82 %) patients and was free of metastases in 80 % of cases, having an impact on eligibility for adjuvant chemotherapy in only 3 (0.8 %) patients. CONCLUSIONS: In situations of primary breast cancer surgery, use of ACOSOG Z-0011 criteria could reduce the rate of cALND by 20 %. Further studies are needed to help select patients for whom abstention from any axillary surgery would be reasonable.

Development of a Prognostic Tool to Guide the Decision to Extend Adjuvant Aromatase Inhibitors for up to Ten Years in Postmenopausal Early Breast Cancer Patients.

Background: The selection of women with hormone receptor-positive (HR+) early breast cancer (EBC) at high risk of relapse after five years (yrs.) of adjuvant aromatase inhibitors (AIs) is crucial, as the benefit of extending AIs is counterbalanced by toxicity. We developed a clinicopathological tool to estimate the residual risk of relapse after five years of adjuvant AIs. Methods: The Institut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest (ICO) database was used to determine a prognostic score of post-five-year AI relapse. Cox regression models estimated our score's prognostic performance. Results: In total, 1105 women were included. Median follow-up was 44 months (IQR = 21-70) post-AI treatment. From the Cox models, we designed a dichotomous prognostic score including the number of macrometastases, age (>70 yrs. vs. ≤70 yrs.), tumor size (≥T2 vs. not), and mitotic activity (≥2 vs. not). Overall, 77.5% of patients were classified as being at low risk and 22.5% at high risk of late recurrence. Low-risk patients had a five- to ten-year local or distant recurrence risk of 7.6% (95% CI, 5.4% to 10.6%) as compared with 26.9% (95% CI, 19.9% to 35.7%) for the high-risk roup. Conclusion: In this study, we developed a simple tool to identify women at high risk of relapse despite completing five years of AIs.

Efficacy of HE4, CA125, Risk of Malignancy Index and Risk of Ovarian Malignancy Index to Detect Ovarian Cancer in Women with Presumed Benign Ovarian Tumours: A Prospective, Multicentre Trial.

BACKGROUND: Presumed benign ovarian tumours (PBOT) are defined by the International Ovarian Tumour Analysis (IOTA) group, without suspected sonographic criteria of cancer, without ascites or metastasis. The aim is to evaluate the efficacy of human epididymis protein 4 (HE4), cancer antigen 125 (CA125), the risk of malignancy index (RMI) and the risk of ovarian malignancy index (ROMA) to predict ovarian cancer in women with PBOT. METHODS: It is a prospective, observational, multicentre, laboratory-based study including women with PBOT in four hospitals from 11 May 2015 through 12 May 2016. Preoperative CA125 and HE4 plasma levels were measured for all women. The primary endpoint was the specificity of CA125 and HE4 for diagnosing ovarian cancer. The main secondary endpoints were specificity and likelihood ratio of RMI, ROMA and tumours markers. RESULTS: Two hundred and fifty patients were initially enrolled and 221 patients were finally analysed, including 209 benign ovarian tumours (94.6%) and 12 malignant ovarian tumours (5.4%). The malignant group had significantly higher mean values of HE4, CA125, RMI and ROMA compared to the benign group (p < 0.001). Specificity was significantly higher using a combination of HE4 and CA125 (99.5%) compared to either HE4 or CA125 alone (90.4% and 91.4%, respectively, p < 0.001). Moreover, the positive likelihood ratio for combination HE4 and CA125 was significantly higher (104.5; 95% CI 13.6-800.0) compared to HE4 alone (5.81; 95% CI 2.83-11.90) or CA125 alone (6.97; 95% CI 3.91-12.41). CONCLUSIONS: The combination of HE4 and CA125 represents the best tool to predict the risk of ovarian cancer in patients with a PBOT.